WEKO3
アイテム
Quasi-Static FDTD Method for Dosimetry in Human due to Contact Current
https://nitech.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5484
https://nitech.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5484f5a1bd00-7015-472e-a5ee-0572bf0c26c5
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Copyright (c) 2010 IEICE http://search.ieice.org/index.html
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2013-06-25 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | Quasi-Static FDTD Method for Dosimetry in Human due to Contact Current | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | eng | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
著者 |
Hirata, Akimasa
× Hirata, Akimasa
× Takano, Yukinori
× Nagai, Toshihiro
|
|||||||||||
著者別名 | ||||||||||||
姓名 | 平田, 晃正 | |||||||||||
bibliographic_information |
en : IEICE transactions on electronics 巻 E93-C, 号 1, p. 60-65, 発行日 2010-01-01 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 0916-8524 | |||||||||||
item_10001_source_id_32 | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AA10826283 | |||||||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
内容記述 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | The present study proposes a quasi-static finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method for dosimetry in humans due to contact current at low frequencies (10 kHz). Our attention focused on wave sources which can reduce computational time. The computational time was found to be reduced using a voltage source of a step function with smooth start. The computational time required for the proposed method was smaller than a quasi-static FDTD method proposed in a previous study. Comparison between our computational results and those in a previous study suggested the effectiveness of our proposal. The difference in in-situ electric field due to different human models was a factor of 2 or so. | |||||||||||
言語 | en |